Program Assessments

COMPETENCY

COMPETENCY BENCHMARK

Measure 1: 70% of students will score at least a 3 (consistently meets competency) with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above;

Measure 2: must score 70% or above on identified assignment

PERCENTAGE OF

Lexington

STUDENTS ACHIEVING

Hazard

BENCHMARK

Aggregate

Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

97% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of

5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5.

98% (N=51) met

benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

Ethical Dilemma Decision Making through Ethics Review Panel – SW 470

Lexington (n=26): 88% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 37): 92% met benchmark.

Competency 2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

97% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5.

98% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

Critical reflection paper on the role of diversity, difference, privilege, and oppression in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness –SW 460

Lexington (n=30): 83% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 90% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 41): 85% met benchmark.

Competency 3: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of

4.4 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

Advocacy and Leadership Paper – SW 470

Lexington (n=40): 100% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 64% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 51): 92% met benchmark.

Competency 4: Engage In Practice- informed Research and Research- informed Practice

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.

Evidence Based Agency Poster – 445

Lexington (n=20): 75% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 31): 84% met benchmark.

Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.

Policy Analysis Paper – SW 430

Lexington (n=43): 86% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=2): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 45): 87% met benchmark.

Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

97% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5.

98% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.5 out of 5.

Interview, transcript and process recording – SW 300

Lexington (n=39): 100% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=2): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 41): 100% met benchmark.

Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.

Family Assessment – SW 300

Lexington (n=42): 95% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=2): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 44): 95% met benchmark.

Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.5 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

Macro Change Project – SW 400

Lexington (n=32): 88% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 64% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 43): 81% met benchmark.

Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

Research proposal to include a brief literature review, methodology, expected analysis and findings, and discussion of implications for social work practice – SW 450

Lexington (n=33): 97% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 44): 98% met benchmark.

BENCHMARK

Measure 1: 70% of students will score at least a 3 (consistently meets competency) with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above; Measure 2: must score 70% or above on the competency based comprehensive exam