Program Assessments

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
BACCALAUREATE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
LAST COMPLETED: April, 2020


COMPETENCY

COMPETENCY BENCHMARK

Measure 1: 70% of students will score at least a 3 (consistently meets competency) with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above;

Measure 2: must score 70% or above on identified assignment


PERCENTAGE OF


Lexington


STUDENTS ACHIEVING


Hazard


BENCHMARK


Aggregate

Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

97% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of

5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5.

98% (N=51) met

benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

Ethical Dilemma Decision Making through Ethics Review Panel – SW 470

Lexington (n=26): 88% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 37): 92% met benchmark.

Competency 2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

97% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5.

98% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

Critical reflection paper on the role of diversity, difference, privilege, and oppression in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness –SW 460

Lexington (n=30): 83% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 90% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 41): 85% met benchmark.

Competency 3: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of

4.4 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

Advocacy and Leadership Paper – SW 470

Lexington (n=40): 100% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 64% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 51): 92% met benchmark.

Competency 4: Engage In Practice- informed Research and Research- informed Practice

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.

Evidence Based Agency Poster – 445

Lexington (n=20): 75% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 31): 84% met benchmark.

Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.

Policy Analysis Paper – SW 430

Lexington (n=43): 86% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=2): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 45): 87% met benchmark.

Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

97% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5.

98% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.5 out of 5.

Interview, transcript and process recording – SW 300

Lexington (n=39): 100% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=2): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 41): 100% met benchmark.

Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.

Family Assessment – SW 300

Lexington (n=42): 95% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=2): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 44): 95% met benchmark.

Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.5 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

Macro Change Project – SW 400

Lexington (n=32): 88% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 64% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 43): 81% met benchmark.

Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience.

100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.

100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.

Research proposal to include a brief literature review, methodology, expected analysis and findings, and discussion of implications for social work practice – SW 450

Lexington (n=33): 97% met benchmark.

Hazard (n=11): 100% met benchmark.

Program (all sites, N = 44): 98% met benchmark.


UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY

MASTER of SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
LAST COMPLETED: September, 2020

  
 
COMPETENCY

BENCHMARK

Measure 1: 70% of students will score at least a 3 (consistently meets competency) with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above; Measure 2: must score 70% or above on the competency based comprehensive exam
 

 
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK
Lexington
n = 75
Fort Sam Houston
n = 22

 

Hazard
n = 3 
 
 

Aggregate
N = 100
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior
Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. 100% (n=75) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.8 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 5 out of 5. 100% (N=100) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5.
Competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with avg of 80% 100% met benchmark with avg score of 83% This cohort did not take competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with average score of
81%.
 
Competency 2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. 100% (n=75) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.7 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.7 out of 5. 100% (N=100) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.
Competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with avg score of 75% 100% met benchmark with avg score of  94% This cohort did not take competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with average score of  79%.
 
Competency 3: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. 100% (n=75) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.7 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 5 out of 5. 100% (N=100) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.
Competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with avg score of  91% 100% met benchmark with avg score of 81% This cohort did not take competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with average score of 89%.
 
 
Competency 4: Engage In Practice- informed Research and Research- informed Practice Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. 99% (n=75) met benchmark with average of 3.92 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.5 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5. 99% (N=100) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5.
Competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with avg score of 90% 100% met benchmark with avg score of 91% This cohort did not take competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with average score of 90%.
 
 
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. 99% (n=75) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.7 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5. 99% (N=100) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5.
Competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with avg score of 81% 100% met benchmark with avg score of 92% This cohort did not take competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with average score of 84%.
 
 
Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
 
 
Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. 99% (n=75) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.8 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 5 out of 5. 99% (N=100) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.
Competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with avg score of  79% 100% met benchmark with avg score of 97% This cohort did not take competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with average score of 84%.
 
 
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. 96% (n=75) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.7 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 5 out of 5. 97% (N=100) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.
Competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with avg score of 79% 100% met benchmark with avg score of 91% This cohort did not take competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with average score of 85%.
 
Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. 99% (n=75) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.7 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 5 out of 5. 99% (N=100) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5.
Competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with avg score of 84% 100% met benchmark with avg score of 88% This cohort did not take competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with average score of 87%.
 
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. 96% (n=75) met benchmark with average of 4.0 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5. 100% (n=3) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5. 98% (N=100) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5.
Competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with avg score of 88% 100% met benchmark with avg score of 94% This cohort did not take competency based comprehensive exam 100% met benchmark with average score of 90%.