UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
BACCALAUREATE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
LAST COMPLETED: April, 2020
COMPETENCY | COMPETENCY BENCHMARK Measure 1: 70% of students will score at least a 3 (consistently meets competency) with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above; Measure 2: must score 70% or above on identified assignment | PERCENTAGE OF Lexington | STUDENTS ACHIEVING Hazard | BENCHMARK Aggregate |
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior | Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. | 97% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5. | 100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5. | 98% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5. |
Ethical Dilemma Decision Making through Ethics Review Panel – SW 470 | Lexington (n=26): 88% met benchmark. | Hazard (n=11): 100% met benchmark. | Program (all sites, N = 37): 92% met benchmark. | |
Competency 2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice | Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. | 97% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5. | 100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5. | 98% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5. |
Critical reflection paper on the role of diversity, difference, privilege, and oppression in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness –SW 460 | Lexington (n=30): 83% met benchmark. | Hazard (n=11): 90% met benchmark. | Program (all sites, N = 41): 85% met benchmark. | |
Competency 3: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice | Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. | 100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5. | 100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5. | 100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5. |
Advocacy and Leadership Paper – SW 470 | Lexington (n=40): 100% met benchmark. | Hazard (n=11): 64% met benchmark. | Program (all sites, N = 51): 92% met benchmark. | |
Competency 4: Engage In Practice- informed Research and Research- informed Practice | Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. | 100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5. | 100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5. | 100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5. |
Evidence Based Agency Poster – 445 | Lexington (n=20): 75% met benchmark. | Hazard (n=11): 100% met benchmark. | Program (all sites, N = 31): 84% met benchmark. | |
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice | Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. | 100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5. | 100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5. | 100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5. |
Policy Analysis Paper – SW 430 | Lexington (n=43): 86% met benchmark. | Hazard (n=2): 100% met benchmark. | Program (all sites, N = 45): 87% met benchmark. | |
Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities | Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. | 97% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5. | 100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.6 out of 5. | 98% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.5 out of 5. |
Interview, transcript and process recording – SW 300 | Lexington (n=39): 100% met benchmark. | Hazard (n=2): 100% met benchmark. | Program (all sites, N = 41): 100% met benchmark. | |
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities | Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. | 100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.1 out of 5. | 100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5. | 100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5. |
Family Assessment – SW 300 | Lexington (n=42): 95% met benchmark. | Hazard (n=2): 100% met benchmark. | Program (all sites, N = 44): 95% met benchmark. | |
Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities | Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. | 100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.2 out of 5. | 100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.5 out of 5. | 100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5. |
Macro Change Project – SW 400 | Lexington (n=32): 88% met benchmark. | Hazard (n=11): 64% met benchmark. | Program (all sites, N = 43): 81% met benchmark. | |
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities | Field supervisor final evaluation of real and/or simulated practice experience. | 100% (n= 40) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5. | 100% (n=11) met benchmark with average of 4.4 out of 5. | 100% (N=51) met benchmark with average of 4.3 out of 5. |
Research proposal to include a brief literature review, methodology, expected analysis and findings, and discussion of implications for social work practice – SW 450 | Lexington (n=33): 97% met benchmark. | Hazard (n=11): 100% met benchmark. | Program (all sites, N = 44): 98% met benchmark. |
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MASTER of SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
CSW and CSD OVERALL ASSESSMENT FINDINGS
LAST COMPLETED: 2019
COMPETENCY |
COMPETENCY BENCHMARK (GENERALIST), based upon the field evaluation oflive practice, score of 3 means the student consistently met requirements. |
COMPETENCY BENCHMARK (SPECIALIZATION), based upon the final field evaluation, score of 3 means the student consistently met requirements. |
PERCENT of STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK |
||
Generalist: n = 62 |
Area of Specialized Practice: Lexington, CSW n = 38 |
Area of Specialized Practice: Fort Sam Houston, CSW n= 25 |
|||
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical |
70% of students will score at |
70% of students will score at |
100% met |
100% met |
100% met |
and Professional Behavior |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
benchmark, |
benchmark, |
benchmark, average |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
average of 4.8. |
average of 4.6. |
of 4.5. |
|
Competency 2: Engage Diversity |
70% of students will score at |
70% of students will score at |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. |
and Difference in Practice |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
|||
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
||||
Competency 3: Advance Human |
70% of students will score at |
70% of students will score at |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. |
Rights and Social, Economic, and |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
|||
Environmental Justice |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
|||
Competency 4: Engage in |
70% of students will score at |
70% of students will score at |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.3. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.2. |
Practice-informed Research and |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
|||
Research-informed Practice |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
|||
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice |
70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.2. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.2. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
||||
Competency 6: Engage with |
70% of students will score at |
70% of students will score at |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. |
Individuals, Families, Groups, |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
|||
Organizations, and Communities |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
|||
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, |
70% of students will score at |
70% of students will score at |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. |
Families, Groups, Organizations, |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
|||
and Communities |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
|||
Competency 8: Intervene with |
70% of students will score at |
70% of students will score at |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. |
Individuals, Families, Groups, |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
|||
Organizations, and Communities |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
|||
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice |
70% of students will score at |
70% of students will score at |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.3. |
with Individuals, Families, Groups, |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
least a 3 with aggregate cohort |
|||
Organizations, and Communities |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. |
|||
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MASTER of SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES PROGRAM OPTION: COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (CSD)
LAST COMPLETED: 2019
COMPETENCY | COMPETENCY BENCHMARK (GENERALIST), based upon the field evaluation oflive practice, score of 3 means the student consistently met requirements. | COMPETENCY BENCHMARK (SPECIALIZATION), based upon the final field evaluation, score of 3 means the student consistently met requirements. | PERCENT of STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK | |||
Generalist: n = 62 | Specialized Practice: Lexington CSD, n = 13 | Specialized Practice: Hazard CSD n = 10 | Specialized Practice: Morehead/Ashland CSD, n = 13 | |||
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior Competency 2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice Competency 3: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice Competency 4: Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities | 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.8. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.8. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. 100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.8. |
100% met benchmark, average of 4.2. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.8. | |||||
100% met benchmark, average of 4.1. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.8. | |||||
100% met benchmark, average of 4.2. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. | |||||
100% met benchmark, average of 4.1. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. | |||||
100% met benchmark, average of 4.2. | 100% met benchmark, average of 5.0. | |||||
100% met benchmark, average of 4.2. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.8. | |||||
100% met benchmark, average of 4.2. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.8. | |||||
100% met benchmark, average of 4.0. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. | |||||
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MASTER of SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
CSW and CSD OVERALL ASSESSMENT FINDINGS LAST COMPLETED: 2019
COMPETENCY | COMPETENCY BENCHMARK (GENERALIST), based upon the field evaluation oflive practice, score of 3 means the student consistently met requirements. | COMPETENCY BENCHMARK (SPECIALIZATION), based upon the final field evaluation, score of 3 means the student consistently met requirements. | PERCENT of STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK | ||
Generalist: n = 62 | Specialized Practice: Clinical Social Work (CSW), n=63 | Specialized Practice: Community & Social Development (CSD), n = 36 | |||
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical | 70% of students will score at | 70% of students will score at | 100% met | 100% met | 100% met |
and Professional Behavior | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | benchmark, | benchmark, | benchmark, |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | average of 4.8. | average of 4.6. | average of 4.8. | |
Competency 2: Engage Diversity | 70% of students will score at | 70% of students will score at | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. |
and Difference in Practice | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | |||
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | ||||
Competency 3: Advance Human | 70% of students will score at | 70% of students will score at | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. |
Rights and Social, Economic, and | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | |||
Environmental Justice | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | |||
Competency 4: Engage in | 70% of students will score at | 70% of students will score at | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.3. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. |
Practice-informed Research and | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | |||
Research-informed Practice | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | |||
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice | 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort | 70% of students will score at least a 3 with aggregate cohort | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.2. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. |
score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | ||||
Competency 6: Engage with | 70% of students will score at | 70% of students will score at | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.8. |
Individuals, Families, Groups, | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | |||
Organizations, and Communities | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | |||
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, | 70% of students will score at | 70% of students will score at | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. |
Families, Groups, Organizations, | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | |||
and Communities | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | |||
Competency 8: Intervene with | 70% of students will score at | 70% of students will score at | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.7. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.6. |
Individuals, Families, Groups, | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | |||
Organizations, and Communities | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | |||
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice | 70% of students will score at | 70% of students will score at | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.5. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.4. | 100% met benchmark, average of 4.3. |
with Individuals, Families, Groups, | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | least a 3 with aggregate cohort | |||
Organizations, and Communities | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | score of 3 (out of 5) or above. | |||
